President Obama Signs Bipartisan Medicare Law

Just a few days ago, President Obama signed H.R. 1845 (112th), the bipartisan Strengthening Medicare and Repaying Taxpayers (SMART) Act, which was introduced by Reps. Tim Murphy (R-PA) and Ron Kind (D-WI) in the House and Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR), Rob Portman (R-OH), Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Richard Burr (R-NC) in the Senate.

The legislation was a bipartisan solution to streamline the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) system, to ensure that seniors and persons with disabilities get timely assistance and taxpayers are repaid millions of dollars every year.

The SMART Act is seen as a victory for senior advocates,

We will see how effective SMART is, as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) must still work to eliminate confusion and uncertainty by providing clear, efficient and definitive information to seniors.

Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP):

  • The MSP process ensures Medicare is reimbursed for medical bills that are the responsibility of another party – such as an insurer or negligent party.
  • A senior or person with disabilities who has been injured, and later obtains recourse through the legal system, often cannot access their settlement until Medicare is reimbursed for all medical costs.
  • The current MSP system is inefficient and slow to return dollars to the Medicare Trust Fund, which is funded by tax payer money.
  • It can take years for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to report reimbursement amounts to beneficiaries and CMS can seek multiple reimbursement amounts over time, providing further delay and uncertainty.

The SMART Act will:

  • Require CMS to maintain a secure web portal to access claims and reimbursement amounts in a timely fashion.
    • CMS must upload care payments they disperse within 15 days with the required information about the payment.
  • Streamline the process of obtaining reimbursement amounts.
    • Medicare beneficiaries must notify CMS they are anticipating a settlement no more than 120 days beforehand.
    • CMS then has 65 days to ensure the web portal is up-to-date, but may request an additional 30 days, if needed.
    • Reimbursement amounts are reliable if downloaded from the web portal within three days of settlement.
  • Provide a process and timeline for discrepancies and appeals.
    • Medicare beneficiaries can provide documentation for discrepancies on the web portal to CMS.
    • CMS has 11 days to respond to discrepancies.
    • If CMS does not respond in 11 days, the amount calculated by the beneficiary is the correct amount. 
    • An additional appeal process must be established by CMS for reimbursements it attempts to collect from insurance plans.
  • Create a threshold for collecting any payment amounts by CMS that are below the cost it incurs to collect an average claim.
  • Readjust the penalty for reporting errors by insurers based on the violation.
  • Ensure greater privacy for beneficiaries by no longer requiring use of full social security or health id claim numbers.
  • Create a three year limit for CMS to seek any repayments beginning from when they were informed of an anticipated settlement.

WA Supreme Court Says That Victim's Family Can Sue for Mishandling of 911 Call

When William ("Bill") Munich, a respected inventor and pilot, had found himself in a dispute with Marvin Ballsmider. Ballsmider was a drunk and deranged neighbor, who had routinely emptied his RV's septic tank on Mr. Munich's property.

One night in October 2005, Ballsmider hunted down Munich on Munich's property with a gun. Munich called 911, and stayed put in the only structure on his property.

That structure had three cars with keys in their ignition. But Bill stayed put only because of the 911 dispatcher's reassurances that local law enforcement was on its way. Unbeknownst to Bill, his call was prioritized not as an emergency, but as a "priority 2 weapons call." The dispatched car drove quietly without any sirens and only slightly over the speed limit. 

Hear the chilling 911 call from Bill Munich on this video from KING5 News.

Every minute mattered to Bill Munich, as he eagerly awaited local law enforcement's arrival. However, Ballsmider got to him first, shooting Bill execution style. Moments later, the police arrived. 

SKWC wrongful death attorneys, Kevin Coluccio, Ray Kahler and Paul Whelan, represent Munich's family. They are fighting to hold Skagit County accountable so that when life threatening, emergency calls are made--mishandled calls are not shrugged aside. In Munich's case, Skagit County denies any responsibility for the mishandled 911 call. Instead, the blame Ballsmider entirely.

As the Seattle Times reported, the the trial court and the appeals court declined to dismiss Munich's case, and the Supreme Court affirmed the decision (8-1 majority). When promising that help was on the way, the Court said that the 911 operator created a special relationship with Munich. The County had a duty to fulfill its promise.

<script src="http://www.king5.com/templates/belo_embedWrapper.js?storyid=176886001&pos=top&swfw=470"></script><object id="bimvidplayer0" width="470" height="264" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000">     <param value="true" name="allowfullscreen"/>    <param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess"/>    <param value="high" name="quality"/>    <param value="true" name="cachebusting"/>    <param value="#000000" name="bgcolor"/>    <param name="movie" value="http://swfs.bimvid.com/bimvid_player-3_2_7.swf?x-bim-callletters=KING" />    <param value="config=http://www.king5.com/?j=176886001&ref=http://www.king5.com/news/local/The-chilling-911-call-that-triggered-a-state-supreme-court-ruling-176886001.html" name="flashvars"/>    <embed src="http://swfs.bimvid.com/bimvid_player-3_2_7.swf?x-bim-callletters=KING" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="470" height="264" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" cachebusting="true" flashvars="config=http://www.king5.com/?j=176886001&ref=http://www.king5.com/news/local/The-chilling-911-call-that-triggered-a-state-supreme-court-ruling-176886001.html" bgcolor="#000000" quality="true">    </embed>
</object><script src="http://www.king5.com/templates/belo_embedWrapper.js?storyid=176886001&pos=bottom"></scriptWh

 

Coyote Ridge Prisoner Almost Beat Cellmate to Death

At Coyote Ridge a prisoner, Kenneth Smith, almost beat to death his cellmate, Scott McDonald.McDonald.jpeg Smith had kept a cast iron smudge pot. used in some Native American rituals to burn incense and create smoke. However, the prison's policy requires inmates to register their religious beliefs to keep "sacred items" like smudge pots, rosaries, etc., which must meet approval.

With two previous convictions for a "most serious offense," why was Smith assigned to the same cell with McDonald, a "minimum custody offender," who was serving an eight year sentence for robbery? 

Coyote Ridge had plenty of information about the danger that Smith could pose to his cell mates. After all, Smith had a history of violent behavior and had assaulted corrections staff, he had incited riotous behavior, and had previously possessed a homemade weapon.

In 1996, he was held at Clallam Bay Corrections Center and after a review by state officials, was determined as one who should be in a close custody unit. Two years later, after numerous assaults and some incidents of malicious mischief, another review resulted in a recommendation that he remain in maximum custody. 

In 1998, Smith also threatened to kill a corrections officer. These are just a few details of Smith's history in prisons and correctional facilities. 

SKWC attorneys Paul Stritmatter and Karen Koehler head the team in representing Mr. McDonald. Trial is set for later next year.

Various newspapers, including The Olympian and The Tri-City Herald have recently provided the details about this preventable and tragic incident. 


Read more here: http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2012/07/13/2018762/former-connell-prisoner-sues-state.html#storylink=cpy

 

 

WA Supreme Court Says State Patrol Has Duty to Disclose

The Washington State Patrol (WSP) has a statutory duty to disclose information and to annuallyGendler-Bike-Caught-on-Montlake-Bridge1-300x200.jpg publish statistical information about accidents. This is the Washington State Supreme Court ruling today in a 7-2 decision for Gendler v. Batiste (WSP Chief). Moreover, the WSP cannot demand plaintiff Mickey Gendler to agree that he would not sue them based on any information that they provide to him.

A few years ago, Mickey Gendler was riding his bike on the Montlake Bridge, and got his tire caught on one of the bridge's seams. Because of the cycling accident, Mickey sustained profound spinal injuries and was rendered a quadriplegic. Now, he requires constant assistance at home and cannot work full time.

Mr. Gendler sought information from WSP, when he had learned that other bicyclists were involved in accidents on the Montlake Bridge before. But the WSP conditioned any disclosure of accident reports and related files on Mr. Gendler's promise that he not sue the state with facts obtained from them.  He refused to sign any such form that would waive his right to sue. Mickey stated:

... I also do not want to waive my right as a citizen to have access to these public records to promote my ability to become fully informed about the history of this bridge and about the conduct of [WSP] or agencies responsibles for providing a reasonably safe road. 

Courts below the state Supreme Court had agreed with Gendler. Now finally, the Supreme Court finds that WSP cannot shield its state records from citizens simply because they were shared with the federal government. Rather, the WSP has a statutory duty to share such information when requested.

Justice Mary Fairhurst, writing for the majority, said that WSP could not hide behind claims that its information was inaccessible because it had been "deposited... in a forbidden DOT electronic database." To do so would "fly in the face of our well grounded principle that technology should enhance access to information that is necessary for justice, not create barriers."

SKWC is proud of this victory that our trial lawyers, Keith Kessler and Garth Jones, obtained on behalf of Mickey Gendler and for all those in the future who may seek information under the Public Records Act regarding information from WSP or other governmental agencies.

WA Appeals Court Upholds $12.8 Million Award for Injured Firefighter

Firefighter Mark Jones fell 15 feet down the hole in the middle of a night in December 2003. He suffered traumatic brain injuries and a shattered pelvis. Many of his vertebrae were broken as were nearly all of his right ribs.

In 2010, a verdict awarded Jones almost $13 million for his disabilities, along with pain and suffering. 

As the Seattle Times reported, today the City of Seattle appealed, saying among other things that it should have been allowed to present evidence at trial of Jones' prior alcohol use, even though he had not been drinking the night of the fall. An expert for the city speculated that Jones could have been disoriented by alcohol withdrawal symptoms, but the appeals court found that the trial judge was correct to bar that testimony from the trial.

The city's insurer secretly videotaped Jones allegedly dancing and chopping wood. Even had Jones been doing such things, the sad truth is that even disabled people can occasionally dance and chop wood. While virtually $13 million seems like a significant amount, constant medical treatment and daily living assistance can quickly add up over the course of several decads. Jones is now in his late 40's.

Steven C. Gonzalez, Newest WA Supreme Court Justice Sworn in

A little bit of history was made yesterday, as Steven C. Gonzalez was sworn in as the newest Washington State Supreme Court judge. He is the first Mexican American Supreme Court justice for our state. He is the second Latino justice on the court. Justice Charles Z. Smith was the first Latino, appointed by former Governor Booth Gardner back in 1988.! Steven C. Gonzalez.jpg

Justice Gonzalez has demonstrated a commitment to equal access to justice, He authored guidelines to improve access for people with disabilities. Additionally, he served as an assistant U.S. Attorney, working on the case against Ahmed Ressam, the accused terrorist who had allegedly plotted to blow the Space Needle.

His bio on the Washington Courts website indicates that he is fluent in Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, and Spanish. He has two sons and lives with them and his wife, Michelle, an Assistant Dean at the UW Law School.

U.S. Chamber's Hypocrisy Exposed: Do As I Say, Not As I Sue

New report shows hypocrisy of Institute for Legal Reform's corporate board members that aggressively litigate while blocking justice for everyday Americans

Washington, D.C. --As the U.S. Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) holds its annual summit - a strategy session on eliminating Americans' access to the civil justice system - a new report exposes ILR's corporate board members that hypocritically use the courts for their own gain against competitors, customers and even each othersay_sue_coverFIN.jpg_sized.jpg.

In its newest report, Do As I Say, Not As I Sue, the American Association for Justice (AAJ) exposes the hypocrisy of 10 ILR board members that regularly use the legal system to advance their own agendas, while at the same time advocating legislation that would close the courthouse doors to anyone who would hold them accountable for their own wrongdoing.

"These corporations, like all Americans, have a right to seek justice through the legal system," said AAJ President Gary M. Paul. "What makes their actions shameful and hypocritical is that these companies are members of ILR's board for the sole purpose of denying American workers and consumers this same right."

One ILR board member highlighted in the report is Honeywell International, which has regularly taken competitors to court, but would prefer not to be held accountable for distributing defective body armor to law enforcement personnel across the country, or downplaying the dangers of asbestos exposure.

In return for its financial contributions to ILR, Honeywell has received policy and public relations help when its negligence has been uncovered. Four days after an Illinois jury delivered a multi-million dollar verdict against Honeywell for conspiring to hide the dangers of asbestos, ILR issued a press release stating that the decision "confirms a troubling trend in the State of Illinois where there is a hostile ligation environment." Additionally, the Madison County Record, an Illinois-based propaganda-as-news outlet fully owned by ILR, featured an article headlined, "McLean County Continues Inching Closer to Becoming a 'Judicial Hellhole.'"

The irony does not stop with Honeywell - AAJ's report also highlights the litigation hypocrisy of ILR board members FedEx, Dow Chemical Company, General Motors Corporation, Caterpillar, State Farm, Koch Industries, Abbott Laboratories, Prudential and Johnson & Johnson.

Online ads will run this week on major news sites and blogs to promote the report, Do As I Say, Not As I Sue: Exposing the Lawsuit-Happy Hypocrites of U.S. Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform, which can be found at www.justice.org/USChamber.

Lawsuit filed for Child's E.coli death at day care

The day care should have been shut down long before this tragedy. !Ronan.jpg 

Day cares can only stay in business if the government decides they are safe. 

Laws require day cares to use proper diapering and cleaning procedures and report outbreaks of illnesses.  Laws require public health departments to act to prevent the spread of disease.  Laws require the Department of Early Learning to revoke the license of day cares that chronically violate the laws that are meant to protect children.

The young parents who entrusted 4 year old Ronan Wilson to Fletch Family Day Care, had no idea that the County and State should have shut that facility down.  The parents had no idea of the number of health and safety violations found over and over again.  But the government knew and took no action.

Fletch Family Day Care was a public safety hazard.  It posed a threat to the health and safety of those it was supposed to care for.  Ultimately the long line of violations and failures lead to the death of Ronan from complications associated with E. Coli.  The preventable outbreak  injured a total 18 children and 3 adults at the Fletch Family Day Care.

After Ronan’s death, the government decided that this last violation should be Fletch Family Day Care’s final one.  It shut down the Day Care.  One child too late.

This lawsuit (PDF to complaint), discussed in The Columbian, seeks to change such conduct in the future to prevent further tragedies, and to compensate for the damage done to the Wilson family.

Paul Stritmatter of SKWC is the attorney for the parents. 

 

Seattle Area Bicyclists Beware!

If you like to ride your bike in Seattle, you had better take heed.

3 of the 4 bike related accidents in Seattle were fatal for the cyclist

Earlier this morning, another Seattle bicyclist was injured by a hit and run driver.  Luckily, that cyclist should survive his injuries.

But, as an article in today's Seattle Times points out, three of the four recent bicycle-related incidents have been fatal. This past Thursday, a cyclist was fatally injured in Renton. A little over a week ago, PATH photographer, 44 year old Mike Wang was killed while riding his bike in the South Lake Union area.

In late July, a 49-year old man was killed in Kirkland.

As a driver, please remember to observe everyone around you, including cyclists and pedestrians. Too often, we see new bike injury clients seriously injured because a driver was texting or was simply inattentive.

NOTE: This blog entry is republished from SKWCBikeLaw.com's blog.

 

Cloture Shuts Goodwin Liu Out of the Ninth Circuit

Only a few weeks ago, Obama'sGoodwin Liu.jpg nominee, 40 year old Gordon Liu (pictured to the right) unfortunately saw the doors shut out his chances as the next Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judge. Liu, a liberal legal scholar, withdrew his nomination to an appeals court judgeship after Senate Republicans blocked a vote on his confirmationin late May.  

Considered a strong potential as the first Asian American U.S. Supreme Court nominee, tenure as a Ninth Circuit judge would have helped cement his qualifications as such a candidate. However, Liu's obvious liberal bent did not help curry favor among Republicans, who objected with vehemence against his record and his criticism of Republican Supreme Court nominees. Democrats failed to deliver 60 votes to end a Republican filibuster. 

At present, 86 vacancies exist in the federal courts. Obama has nominated 47 people, of which Liu was one. As Mr. Liu explained to Obama in his letter, continuing with his nomination had no chance of filling the Ninth Circuit's 'desperate need for judges.'  

Don't miss "Hot Coffee!"

This weekend I got to see my last movie at the Seattle International Film Festival. It was "Hot Coffee," a documentary by Susan Saladoff. It made me incredibly proud to be in this profession and to work with some of the best trial lawyers in the country.cropped-hotcoffee.jpg

The movie is an absolute must-see. Period. Full stop. When the DVD comes out (later this summer), run, don't walk to buy it. Better yet, you can see it if you have HBO later this month. It is not a dry, boring documentary: Al Franken and Paul Grisham keep things lively.

Although I work for a plaintiffs law firm, even I had misconceptions about the infamous "hot coffee" lawsuit against McDonalds. This documentary, however, is not just about opening everyone's eyes to the jaw dropping injuries that Stella Liebeck, the then 79-year old woman sustained from spilling some scalding hot coffee on herself. It reveals how McDonalds had previously received 700 complaints about the ridiculously hot coffee.

Moreover, the film shows how corporations have spent many hundreds of million dollars on distorting the truth about tort claims -- from "tort reform" to caps on damages. Trial lawyers are conveniently pegged as the villains, while insurance companies are portrayed as the victims: a comedy and utter tragedy at the same time.

A doctor specializing in burn injuries explains in "Hot Coffee," that the holding temperature for coffee was so hot that at best, if the coffee touched one's skin for a few seconds, one would suffer 3rd degree burns. Regardless, McDonalds chose to ignore the obvious threat to its customers' safety until brave Ms. Liebeck attempted to hold them accountable. 

The film also features a couple of other poignant stories: One, about an ex-Halliburton worker who was brutally raped by her coworkers in Iraq; but denied the ability to sue her employer/employees thanks to a mandatory arbitration clause. The other story is a needlessly tragic situation, where one twin boy was brain damaged in utero, because of a negligent doctor. That family was essentially robbed of the jury verdict due to the state's cap on damages.

Buy this DVD for all of your friends, family, neighbors, etc., so that they learn how corporations are attempting to dismantle the civil justice system. 

Negligent Drivers Now Face Stiffer Penalties

Earlier this week, Senate Bill 5326. which increases the penalties for negligent driving, was signed into law. 

Now, negligent drivers, who seriously injure or kill a cyclist, will face much harsher consequences. Thank goodness, is undoubtedly the response of many of our clients and their family members, when they learn about this. SKWC handles numerous cases, where negligent driving results in seriously injured or killed cyclists.

One SKWC bicycle injury client, a UW medical student, was riding his bicycle safely with a helmet, but when a vehicle made an illegal left turn in front of him, he did not have a chance. After his bike collided into the offending vehicle, the force of the crash threw him violently to the pavement. He suffered traumatic brain injury, a broken femur, and facial lacerations.

Another SKWC client was tragically killed at 14 years old, when a Pierce County police car hit him. In that case, the young boy was riding his bicycle lawfully with his friend.

Young Andrew was killed when riding his bicycle lawfully, struck by a Pierce County police car.

The police officer did not have his siren on, and looked down to adjust his radio. But when he looked back at the road, the officer saw the two children on bicycles. The officer was traveling at about 50 mph and had no time to stop or avoid hitting the young boys. He began to brake as soon as he could to bring the car to a stop. 

Time will tell how this new law will affect cases, where law enforcement agents are found negligent.

The bill's main sponsor, Sen. Adam Kline (D-Seattle) explains, "A small fine is not a stiff enough penalty for killing or seriously injuring someone due to negligent driving. This bill puts reasonable expectations on motorists to pay attention to bicyclists and other non-automobile users of the roadway, and will help provide some sense of justice to families who have lost loved ones.”

This blog entry is republished from SKWCBikeLaw's blog

Follow Up to SPD Case

This post is a follow up to the previous post about the Seattle Times article regarding a settlement that SPD made with an SKWC client.     

Don Meyer was on his way home from work after putting in his graveyard shift as a maintenance mechanic when his vehicle was struck head-on by a City of Seattle patrol car.  He had been driving southbound on the 4th Avenue Street bridge, traveling with caution and under the speed limit because of the icy road conditions that morning. 

A City of Seattle police officer did not drive his patrol car with the same safe approach that Don had chosen.  Instead, SPD officer Welch raced northbound on the bridge.  He then lost control of the patrol car, fishtailing and ultimately crashing into Don’s light weight truck.  The force was so great that Don bent the steering wheel and smashed his head into the windshield, shattering it.  

Pictured to the right is a shot of Don's windshield, after the SPD car crashed into his truck. Meyers windshield.jpg

Don’s medical treatment journey began as he was taken by ambulance to an Emergency Room.  After a neck-fusion and countless medical appointments with many specialist, Don is left with permanent limitations and disabilities.  Despite working hard to recover and following his doctors recommendations, Don has headaches regularly, suffers from fatigue and has physical limitations. 

He is able to continue to work, but, performing his job is more tiresome and difficult.  Don has the support of his wife, Sandra, his friends, co-workers and family.  He is grateful for their support and continues to try to improve his physical and mental condition.

Seriously Injured SKWC Client Settles with Seattle Police Department

Earlier today, the Seattle Times reported a story about a seriously injured client of Stritmatter Kessler, who settled with the City of Seattle Police Department. Officer John Welch had been driving too fast for the icy road conditions on Feb. 11, 2009. Welch was not driving to any emergency call. SPD image.gif As a result, Mr. Meyers sustained profound injuries to his chest, back, abdomen, and neck. 

The article includes the important fact that the "City of Seattle concedes it is liable for any damages or injuries" that Welch sustained in the crash. This is what Senior Assistant City Attorney Robin Collins admits in a March 2010 court document.

Also significant is the extent and the gravity of Mr. Meyer's injuries. Despite that he was a model patient and followed all of his doctors' orders, he continues to experience ongoing medical issues.

Because the City of Seattle accepted responsibility, it will hopefully put measures in place as to training and procedure standards for all of its officers, so that it can avoid this type of tragic incident.

Please check back for more details about the details of this case and Kevin Coluccio's comments.

SCOTUS Decision re AT&T Mobility v Concepcion Harms Consumers' Chance at Justice

The United States Supreme Court dealt a deadly blow to Americans seeking justice when faced with forced arbitration clauses. Its decision now permits corporations to give themselves immunity, whenever they cheat consumers/employees. By forcing arbitration and banning class action lawsuits, big corporations can get away with wrongs that affect huge numbers of consumers, especially if the amount of damages would not justify individual claims.AT&T logo.jpg

SCOTUS chose to ignore the blatant fact that numerous states consider provisions bans on class action lawsuits unconscionable. Such is the case in Washington State. 

Here are some brief facts about the backgroung of AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion:

  • Liza and Vincent Concepcion sued AT&T in 2006, alleging that the wireless carrier defrauded millions of customers in California by advertising phones as “free,” then tacking on an undisclosed $30 charge for the phone.
  • If multiplied across all AT&T customers, the $30 charge would amount to millions of dollars in allegedly wrongful gains.
  • AT&T sought to dismiss the case by invoking a forced arbitration clause containing a class-action ban that it had placed in the Concepcion’s contract.
  • Both the California District Court and the Ninth Circuit rejected AT&T’s request, holding that the class-action ban was unconscionable under California law because it would exculpate the company from accountability for wrongdoing.
  • Courts applying the contract law of 20 states have struck down class-action bans for the same reason – because they would function as a “get out of jail free” card for corporate wrongdoing.

Learn From Tacoma Police's Errors

According to a recent article in the Seattle Times, Young Zina Linnik, a 12 year old girl, was abducted on the night of July 4, 2007. A deputy sergeant called Tacoma Police spokesman Mark Fulghum at home about 4 a.m. on July 5, asking him to send out an Amber Alert. Zina.jpg

Rather than issue the Alert immediately, Mr. Fulghum fell back asleep.

Mr. Fulghum had taken Advil PM at about 1 AM earlier on July 5th. Unfortunately, he was the only person at that point under Tacoma Police Department’s unwritten policy who had the authority to Amber Alerts.

Since then, the Tacoma Police now has a formal written policy, allowing officers with the rank of sergeant or above to issue the alerts without going through Fulghum. The organization apparently learned at least something from its errors, despite its claims that issuing an Alert earlier would likely not have helped.

Interestingly, one of the first police supervisors on the scene, had requested that an Amber Alert go out less than an hour after the abduction.

With indications that the young girl likely died soon after her abduction from trauma to the head, Fulghum said to The News Tribune that “I don’t know that it would have made any difference by going out a few hours earlier.”

Note that experts on child abductions say that such alerts should be issued within four hours from the time a child is kidnapped.

Tacoma Police continues to say that it did nothing wrong because issuing Amber Alerts are voluntary. 

Looks like that Department needs to get clear on the significance and reasons for Amber Alerts. After all, these Alerts contain critical information and have repeatedly served as an important tool for law enforcement to locate abductors. 

Trial is set for this September. Zina Linnik's family will undoubtedly mourn her loss for a long time. But hopefully the lawsuit will help obtain the justice they seek against the Tacoma Police Department, Pierce County, and the State of Washington.

 

Mickey Gendler takes on Rob McKenna in the Seattle Times

2014359168.jpgMickey Gendler became a quadriplegic because of governmental negligence.  On the one hand McKenna praised settlement of the case saying it was the right thing to do.  On the other McKenna has been pushing the legislature to protect the Government from being sued in the future.

Today Mickey Gendler speaks the truth in an editorial published by The Seattle Times.  It is a beautifully written piece.  I can hear the outrage in his voice.  Government officials should spend their energy protecting the safety of citizens.  Instead of trying to create new laws that would give them a free license to harm.

Go Mickey!

Ten Year Anniversary of Kris Kime's death

kime.jpgThis Monday marks a decade since our client Kris Kime was beaten to death during the Mardi Gras Riots.

I had the privilege of representing the family.  They came together to my office.  Ken the father, Kim the mother.  And even though they had long since been divorced, they came united as a family.  I came to know Kimberlee, Kris' step mom.  His brother Keith.  His sister Kirsten.  His brother Cameron.  His grandparents.  Through them, I learned who Kris was and how much he was loved.  I wept with them when his killer Jerrell Thomas was convicted and sentenced to present.  I wept with them when his conviction was overturned for legal reasons and his sentence plea bargained down.  I went to Kirsten's wedding and met some of the people who had received Kris' organs.  I'm thankful for facebook so I can see what they are up to.  And my breakfasts with Kim who is one of the most caring people I've ever known.

Kris Kime would have been 30 years old on Monday.  His life was too short.  But it was not in vain.

King5 did a show in memory of one of the most shameful incidents in our city's history.   A moment when police were ordered not to help citizens in need.  They did a 2nd story on the killer.  If you are in pioneer square visit Kris' memorial by the pergola.  Light a candle.  And think of the greater humanity that this young man and his family stand for.

 

 

Keep State Agencies In Check

In case you missed it, an insightful editorial appeared in this Sunday's The Columbian, "Courts keep failures by state agencies in check." Magana and Wieland point out the serous problems with endorsing special legal protections for state government agencies whose negligent actions or inactions cause harm to citizens. 

Importantly, Magana and Wieland explain that "government is never responsible for anyone’s actions but its own, and is never judged on any failures or bad choices except for its own." Only if "but for" the government's failures did an injury arise, then it could it then be held liable.

Please read the piece in its entirety for a thoughtful and accurate explanation to understand why we must continue to hold the government accountable via lawsuits in Washington state.

In the interest of full disclosure, one of the authors of this editorial is Jesse Magana, a client of Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Coluccio.

Visit New KeepWASafe.com Website & Blog

As we head into this year's first legislative session, the law firm of Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Coluccio (SKWC) wants to provide an informational resources via a new website, KeepWASafe.com. As the days and weeks progress, please visit it frequently for more information, which will help you understand why the agenda to bar lawsuits against the state for tort cases will make Washington less safer for all of us.  

KeepWASafe WEBSITE screenshot.jpg

We welcome your comments and questions.  

Should Our Government Be Above The Law?

We pay a lot of taxes.  Our Government gets to use those taxes to supposedly help take care of us.  It is supposed to build and maintain safe roads for us.  Monitor and take care of our state's abused children.  Make sure that criminals on parol are actually being watched over so they don't kill us in our sleep.

But our government doesn't always do a good job.  We find this out through tragic headlines.  We find it out when people sue to hold the Government accountable.  To prevent bad practices from continuing. 

Our State Attorney General wants to limit lawsuits against the Government and its insurance companies.  It wants to create a special class that is above the law.  And it wants to be the only one in that class.

All the rest of us are responsible if we mess up.  But the Government won't be if new laws are passed.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2013787841_apwastatejudgments1stldwritethru.html

This may save money in the short run.  But what about the long haul.  If we take away government checks and balances, then what kind of a monster will we be creating.  What incentive will the government have to get things right - if they are above the law.

 

WA State Says That $8 Million Payout Was the Right Thing To Do for Injured Cyclist

By Keith L. Kessler

Yesterday AM, KUOW aired an uneven story about the fact that WA State has recently had to make large payouts in tort claims.  The reporter, Austin Jenkins, opened his story with a brief description of a recent SKWC cases, which I handled: This was the case of Mickey Gendler, a lifelong cyclist and attorney, who was seriously injured in a bicycle accident in 2007.  

Mr. Jenkins failed to mention that the State admitted that the $8 million award was justified.

When interviewed by a Seattle P-I reporter, the risk management director of WSDOT, John Milton said, "This was a catastrophic event to a very strong individual. This was the right thing to do for both Mr. Gendler and the taxpayer."  [emphasis added]

When tragedy strikes an individual, in the form of an unpredictable accident, all of those responsible need to be held accountable.  Even when one of those parties might be the State.

Tax Ramifications in Sex Abuse Cases

We learned a great number of valuable lessons from a recent case against a Native American Tribe and wanted to make sure to pass on at least one of these lessons here. I’ll just mention one for this post and perhaps save the rest for future posts: Remember to think about taxes, especially if you want a settlement to be considered tax-exempt.

A recent case involved a client, who was raped by a juvenile offender. That juvenile was a member of a Native American tribe and had a long list of criminal convictions who had been subject to an equally long list of court orders and restrictions. As a ward of the tribe, his actions were under the control of the tribe’s Indian Child Welfare Department. We thought the department had abrogated its responsibilities and acted negligently in several of its decisions and actions, which all led inexorably to the rape of our client. We decided to sue the tribe for the injuries our client suffered. We eventually settled the case for $1 million

Here’s where the issue of taxes enters the picture: In 1996, the “physical” was inserted into the Internal Revenue Code 104(a)(2), requiring that for a settlement to be considered tax-exempt and eligible for a tax-exempt structured settlement, it must have its origin in physical personal injury or physical sickness.  For a settlement to have its origin in physical injury and thus be tax-exempt under IRC 104(a)(2), there must be some Observable Bodily Harm (“OBH”).  Some examples of OBH include bruises, scratches, swelling, cuts and bleeding.

Since 1996, the taxation of damages received from sex abuse cases has been particularly problematic.  Sex abuse cases inherently involve issues regarding the preservation of evidence of physical harm.  By the time the abuse has been reported or the victim can articulate the abuse, any physical injuries may have healed leaving little or no evidence of physical injury.  This can make it difficult to meet the OBH standard to satisfy the physical injury requirement of IRC 104(a)(2).

The complaint or settlement demand documentation remains a critical piece of the puzzle.  If these documents allege only non-physical injuries such as the intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, classifying the damages as taxable is consistent with the pleadings.   Therefore, remember to include details of physical injury as the origin of a claim in your complaint or settlement demand, to support the position that the settlement is tax-exempt as being based in physical injury.  Also remember to collect and preserve proof of any physical injury whenever possible, as additional support just in case. 

When closing a sex abuse case, the negotiation and finalization of the settlement can also help ensure that the damages will be classified as unambiguously tax-exempt.  Do the parties, and most particularly the payor, intend the payment as compensation for personal physical injuries?  If so, the settlement documentation should specifically state such intent.  Be sure that you insert the necessary language in your pleadings and in any settlement documents in order to avoid adverse tax consequences.